Friday, March 13, 2009

RIP: Journalist Jim Cramer & "Mad Money"

This blogger's self-disclosure — in the blogger profile in the left sidebar — defines himself as "a broken-down, old, former college history teacher." Unfortunately, "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" arrives when this old blogger has gone beddy-bye. However, thanks to the magic of cyberspace, the video clips of last night's "Smackdown" between Stewart and his punching bag o'the week, Jim Cramer of CNBC, can be embedded in this blog. Stewart didn't pull his punches and Cramer put up little or no defense. The facedown was reminiscent of Stewart's earlier attack on the faux theater of CNN's "Crossfire." One good embedded video deserves another.

[x YouTube/Atvartist Channel]
"Crossfire" With Paul Begala and Tucker Carlson (10/15/04)
Guest: Jon Stewart



On January 6, 2005, CNN canceled "Crossfire" and fired Tucker Carlson. Jim Cramer should be looking over his shoulder. If this is (fair & balanced) retribution, so be it.

[x Salon]
Cramer vs. Stewart, In Person
By Alex Koppelman

Tag Cloud of the following article

created at TagCrowd.com

In the day leading up to Thursday night's face-to-face meeting between feuding cable hosts Jim Cramer and Jon Stewart, both men seemed to be trying to defuse tensions and downplay their very public spat. Stewart even told his audience on Wednesday that the interview, when it happened, was, "by all measure, bound to disappoint anyone that's been following."

He was wrong. What "Daily Show" viewers saw on Thursday night wasn't a boring love-in; it was a smackdown, or perhaps an homage to the human sacrifice scene from "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" -- the one where they rip the victim's heart out and show it to him. At the very least, it was a riveting half-hour, something almost completely unlike anything else ever seen on television. (You can watch it below.)

The clue that the interview wouldn't be rainbows and hugs came early on, when Stewart told his guest, "Look, we're both snake oil salesmen to a certain extent." Cramer, still eager to please, jumped in to say, "I'm not disagreei--" before being cut off by Stewart, who said, "But we do label the show as snake oil here." At this, the CNBC host visibly grimaced.

At points like that during the interview -- and there were many of them -- you almost had to feel sorry for Cramer. It was clear he'd come to the interview prepared to make nice, even desperate to. His voice was plaintive and cracking, his eyes were watery, he seemed willing and eager to agree with any and all of Stewart's criticisms in a futile effort to make the pain stop. Besides, just Wednesday night, the "Daily Show" host had been playing down the feud, and now here he was rolling numerous clips from a 2006 interview that shows Cramer discussing some unsavory practices from his hedge fund days, the kinds of things that could get the Securities and Exchange Commission involved.

And then, on the other hand, so much of the beating Stewart delivered felt deserved, especially when, towards the end, he started getting mad.

"I understand you want to make finance entertaining. But it's not a fucking game," he told Cramer. Then, referring to that video, he continued:

And I -- when I watch that, I get, I can't tell you how angry that makes me. Because what it says to me is that you all know. You all know what's going on. You can draw a straight line from those shenanigans to the stuff that was being pulled at Bear and at AIG and all this derivative market stuff that is this weird Wall Street side bet... Listen, you knew what the banks were doing and yet were touting it for months and months. The entire network was. And so now to pretend this was some crazy once-in-a-lifetime tsunami that no one could have seen coming is disingenuous at best and criminal at worst.

Stewart made clear, on more than one occasion, that it was really CNBC and financial journalism he was angry with, not just Cramer, but that the "Mad Money" host had become the symbol for his anger. And he took out after financial journalism generally.

"Look, nobody's asking for them to be a regulatory agency. But can't -- whose side are they on?" Stewart asked Cramer at one point. "It feels like they have to reconcile: Is their audience the Wall Street traders... These guys at these companies were on a Sherman's March through their companies financed by our 401Ks... And they burned the fucking house down with our money and walked away rich as hell and you guys knew that that was going on."

It's hard to knock Stewart for this kind of thing, as he's absolutely right about what financial journalists should have been doing and about their failure to report a realistic picture of the big banks rather than the rosy one painted by their executives. But he did come across a little naïve, especially for someone who works in television. CNBC's audience is absolutely the traders -- they're the lifeblood of the network. Lay people don't watch business news 24 hours a day, but people in the field do, and so CNBC and plenty of other financial journalism is made by them and for them. Doing the kind of hard-hitting reporting Stewart is calling for would screw up the business model.

Still, it's a nice dream to have, and Stewart at least got his opponent to agree to try it his way.

"Maybe we could remove the financial expert and the 'In Cramer We Trust' and start getting back to fundamentals on the reporting as well and I can go back to making fart noises and funny faces," he said at the close of the interview.

"I think we make that deal, right here," Cramer responded, and the two men shook hands.

Update: Comedy Central's posted the video of the 03/12/09 interview on Hulu.com, which you can watch below. ♥



[Alex Koppelman is a staff writer for the online magazine Salon. He runs Salon's political blog, "War Room." Formerly the media critic for another online magazine, Dragonfire, Koppelman is a contributing editor at Smith Magazine and has written for New York Magazine and the Huffington Post, among others. Alex has appeared on MSNBC, CNN Headline News and Fox News, and is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania.

Jim Cramer graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College where he was also president of the Harvard Crimson. In 1983, while bed-ridden with the mumps for over 3 months, he took an even greater interest in the stock market, as all he could do was read the papers. Cramer later earned a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School. During his years at Harvard Law, Cramer worked as a research assistant with Professor Alan Dershowitz. Cramer obtained employment in 1984 as a stock broker in Goldman Sachs' Sales & Trading department. Cramer's success in this position led him to fund his own hedge fund, Cramer & Co. (later Cramer, Berkowitz, & Co.) in 1987. The fund operated out of the offices of hedge fund pioneer Michael Steinhardt's Steinhardt, Fine, Berkowitz & Co. Cramer left the hedge fund and moved into financial reporting with "Mad Money with Jim Cramer" that began airing on CNBC on March 14, 2005.

Jon Stewart has been the host of Comedy Central's comedy and news show "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" since 1999. A former stand-up comedian known for his biting sarcasm, Stewart began hosting television shows in 1989, beginning with "Short Attention Span Theater." Before Stewart's gig on "The Daily Show" he hosted "You Wrote It, You Watch It" (1992) and "The Jon Stewart Show" (1993-95), and appeared several times in HBO's "The Larry Sanders Show" (1992-2001). Stewart is a graduate of the College of William and Mary.]

Copyright © 2009 Salon Media Group

Get the Google Reader at no cost from Google. Click on this link to go on a tour of the Google Reader. If you read a lot of blogs, load Reader with your regular sites, then check them all on one page. The Reader's share function lets you publicize your favorite posts.

Copyright © 2009 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.