It's not too soon to anticipate a replay of the chaos in Florida in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush (R-TX) and Albert A. (Al) Gore Jr. (D-TN). Ultimately, the legal challenge to the results of the election in Florida reached the Supreme Court of the United States. On December 10, 2000, the Court ruled in a split-decision in Bush v. Gore by a vote of 5 (Republican-appointed Justices) - 4 (Democrat-appointed Justices) that George W. Bush was the POTUS 43. However, in the 2020 election, The *ILK is a lying, despicable, dishonest creature who is the driving force of the criminal Mafia known as the Republican Party and the Florida chaos in 2000 will be the equivalent of a garden party compared to the existential evil that will be done by The *ILK and his minions. If this is a (fair & balanced) prediction of a chaotic 2020 election, so be it.
PS: The source of this blog's noms de stylo serpent reference to the three women on the NY Fishwrap's Op-Ed staff began with this 2001 essay by The Cobra (Maureen Dowd) who's been joined by her distaff colleagues: The Krait (Gail Collins), and — most recently — The Viper (Michelle Goldberg).
[x YouTube]
"The Liar Tweets Tonight" (Parody of "The Lion Sleeps Tonight")
By Roy Zimmerman and The ReZisters, featuring Sandy Riccardi
[x NY Fishwrap]
Trump Might Cheat — Activists Are Getting Ready
By The Viper (Michelle Goldberg)
TagCrowd Cloud provides a visual summary of the blog post below
This summer, a bipartisan group of former government officials, political professionals, lawyers and journalists held a series of war game exercises about how the 2020 election might go wrong. Convened by the law professor Rosa Brooks and the historian Nils Gilman, it was called the Transition Integrity Project, and the results were alarming.
“We assess with a high degree of likelihood that November’s elections will be marked by a chaotic legal and political landscape,” said a resulting report [PDF]. President Trump, it said, “is likely to contest the result by both legal and extralegal means.”
Participants in the Transition Integrity Project played out tactics the president might try if threatened with defeat, including federalizing the National Guard to stop the counting of mail-in ballots. In each scenario, the decisions of the Department of Justice, state officials and the candidates themselves proved pivotal.
But so was the willingness of masses of people to protest. “A show of numbers in the streets — and actions in the streets — may be decisive factors in determining what the public perceives as a just and legitimate outcome,” said the report.
Progressive organizers are preparing for this eventuality. They’ve seen Trump tweet about postponing the election, spread lies about voter fraud and try to sabotage the Postal Service. Many of them remember the 2000 presidential election, when rowdy Republican operatives physically stopped the vote count in Florida while hapless Democrats put their faith in the courts. (One of the instigators of the so-called Brooks Brothers Riot was none other than the criminal Trump adviser Roger Stone.)
So a coalition of progressive groups, as well as some anti-authoritarian conservative ones, is organizing under the rubric Protect the Results to get people into the streets if Trump tries to cheat in November. “It’s a pretty massive effort that’s underway,” said Rashad Robinson, executive director of Color of Change, which is part of the coalition. Activists all over the country, he said, are “really gearing up for this fight.”
It could be a fight unlike any most living Americans have experienced. “We have been building grass-roots power for the last three and a half years,” said Ezra Levin, one of the co-founders of Indivisible, which helped put the Protect the Results coalition together. But, he said, “this is something different. This is not just a one day showing up at congressional district offices or town halls or a march. This is a possibility of a dayslong or weekslong mobilization, so we knew we had to start preparing now.”
Recently the conservative Michael Brendan Dougherty wrote, in National Review, that he has “the unsettling sense that some progressives are steeling themselves for a color revolution in the United States,” referring to the uprisings that ousted autocrats in post-Soviet countries like Ukraine. He’s right, but not in the way he thinks. Dougherty believes progressives relish the prospect of violent revolution, writing that they think “Trump must be ‘toppled,’ somehow, preferably in a major confrontation.”
But for most of us who foresee the possibility of a major confrontation, it is in no way preferable to a normal election. The prospect is, rather, a source of terror and dread that must nonetheless be considered.
“The depressing overall thrust of our exercises ended up being that if the Trump campaign is in fact truly determined to stay in power no matter what, and is willing to be absolutely ruthless about it, it’s hard to know what stops that,” Brooks said of the Transition Integrity Project.
Biden, she said, “can call a press conference, but Donald Trump can call up the 82nd Airborne.” Should Trump succeed in exploiting state power, “the only thing left is what pro-democracy movements and human rights movements around the world have always done, which is sustained, mass peaceful demonstrations.”
We don’t yet know whether Americans will turn out in necessary numbers for such demonstrations. The recent racial justice protests are some of the largest America has ever seen; protests over Trump’s systematic subversion of democratic norms have been smaller.
The group of people “that are ready to take to the streets for process fights, and whether or not our Constitution is respected, is different than people that are going to the streets because people are dying,” said Rahna Epting, executive director of MoveOn, also part of the Protect the Results coalition. “But I have faith that generally folks out there are connecting the dots between all of these causes right now.”
If Trump tries to corrupt the election, we’re going to need the people who want to abolish the police and those who want to defend the integrity of the FBI to work together. They may have to put their bodies on the line in a way that few living Americans have experienced.
“We’re not prepared today to deal with this,” said Epting. The hope is that come November, we will be. ###
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..
Copyright © 2020 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves
No comments:
Post a Comment
☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!
Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.