Today, The NY Fishwrap's Viper (Michelle Goldberg) Issues A Cri De Cœur "To Stop Some Of America’s Worst Men From Blotting Out The Legacy Of One Of Our Very Best Women"

In her most recent Op-Ed essay, the NY Fishwrap's Viper (Michelle Goldberg) calls out the hypocrisy of the supporters of The *ILK (*Impeached But Not Removed) Lyin' King to provide The *ILK not one, but two, appointments to the United States Supreme Court while The *ILK was in the shadow of a Lame-Duck presidential term. It was one thing to sully the March 16, 2016, appointment by POTUS 44 in the late days of his 2^nd term of distinguished federal judge Merrick Garland. But the Senate Majority Leader (Moscow Mitch McConnell), created the Rule of 2016 to justify the intentional senatorial block of the Garland appointment. The rationale was that with the 2016 election in the offing, an appointment to a position with a life term was to be a matter to be settled by the voters in the 2016 presidential election so that the incoming POTUS could appoint a person who was acceptable to the winning political party. What has exercised The Viper is the blatent disregard of the Rule of 2016 to allow The *ILK to appoint a successor to the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg with the election of 2020 only little more than a month away. If this is a (fair & balanced) outraged response to political malfeasance, so be it.

PS: The source of this blog's noms de stylo serpent reference to the three women on the NY Fishwrap's Op-Ed staff began with this 2001 essay by The Cobra (Maureen Dowd) who's been joined by her distaff colleagues: The Krait (Gail Collins), and — most recently — The Viper (Michelle Goldberg).

---

[x YouTube]

"The Liar Tweets Tonight" (Parody of "The Lion Sleeps Tonight")

By Roy Zimmerman and The ReZisters, featuring Sandy Riccardi

[x NY Fishwrap]
Can Mitch McConnell Be Stopped?
By The Viper (Michelle Goldberg)




TagCrowd Cloud provides a visual summary of the blog post below

Bader block business Collins continue court death Democrats election fanatic Federalist fill Garland Ginsburg give Graham Grassley half hear hold Joe justice justify main McConnell Mitch month nominee Opinion people president public reading Republicans rule Ruth seat Senate site Society stopped story Supreme Terms Times Trump vote wish year

created at TagCrowd.com

Two years ago at The Atlantic Festival, Senator Lindsey Graham defended the Republican decision to block President Barack Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland. “If an opening comes in the last year of President Trump’s term, and the primary process is started, we’ll wait to the next election,” Graham said.

Now that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died, only a month and a half before the 2020 election, the chance that the senator keeps his word seems infinitesimal. (He has already said that after Brett Kavanaugh, “the rules have changed.”)

Mitch McConnell certainly has no intention of abiding by the so-called McConnell rule, an invention to justify the Senate’s refusal to consider Garland in March 2016. “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice,” McConnell said then. “Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

But only hours after Ginsburg’s death was announced, McConnell said in a statement, “President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate.” His tortuous excuse is that his made-up rule is meant to apply only when the Senate and the presidency are controlled by different parties.

Replacing a progressive icon on the Supreme Court with a hard-core reactionary — one who will overturn Roe v. Wade, decimate civil rights law and fully unshackle big business — is an existential matter for the right. It is both the culmination of decades of conservative activism and perhaps an insurance policy in case the 2020 election itself ends up being decided by the court, like Bush v. Gore.

The question now is whether Trump and McConnell can be stopped, and what Democrats should do if they aren’t.

Shortly before Ginsburg’s death was announced, Senator Lisa Murkowski told Alaska Public Media that she wouldn’t vote to confirm a new Supreme Court justice this close to the election. The Times’s Jonathan Martin tweeted that another Republican senator, Susan Collins, told him earlier this month that she would oppose seating a new justice in October

Should Collins hold firm — obviously nothing to count on — two more Republican senators would have to defy their leadership to save an already beaten, suffering, riven country from being torn fully in half.

There’s a potential twist, because of the special election in Arizona to fill John McCain’s old seat. Mark Kelly, a Democrat, is running against Martha McSally, who was appointed to that seat after McCain’s death. If Kelly wins, as he is favored to, he could be seated as early as November 30.

Depending on when the Senate holds confirmation hearings, that could mean only three Republican senators would be required to hold the seat for Joe Biden to fill. It’s doubtful that three Republican senators would show such civic decency, but we should still use every tool at our disposal to demand it of them.

Outraged people should take to the streets en masse. Democrats in the Senate may not be able to stop Republicans from shoving a nominee through before the election or during a lame-duck session, but if it happens they should do all in their power to grind Senate business to a halt.

And if Republicans do give Ginsburg’s seat to some Federalist Society fanatic, Democrats must, if they win back the presidency and the Senate, abolish the filibuster and expand the court, adding two seats to account for both Garland and Ginsburg.

This goes against Joe Biden’s instincts toward bipartisanship and national reconciliation. But if Republicans continue to ruthlessly bend the rules to establish the domination of the minority over the majority, only hardball tactics can restore democratic equilibrium. Republicans will shriek, but their brazen hypocrisy should justify such dramatic moves in the eyes of the public. They’ll be the ones who’ve annihilated whatever legitimacy the court has left.

Graham’s words couldn’t be clearer, nor could those of Senator Chuck Grassley, the former chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who blocked Garland. Just last month, Grassley said that he “couldn’t move forward” with a Trump nominee this year because of the 2016 standard. If Republicans force a justice on us, it’s because they believe that standards are for suckers, and people who hold power need not be constrained by any pledge or institutional tradition.

According to Ginsburg’s granddaughter, the justice made a dying wish: “My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.”

It doesn’t matter how exhausted we are, or how difficult the odds. In this hell-spawned year, we can either give up, or give everything we can to stop some of America’s worst men from blotting out the legacy of one of our very best women. ###

[Michelle Goldberg has been an Opinion columnist at this newspaper since 2017. She is the author of several books about politics, religion and women’s rights, and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize for public service in 2018 for reporting on workplace sexual harassment issues. She received a BA (English) from the State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo and an MS (journalism) from the University of California at Berkeley.]


Copyright © 2020 The New York Times Company


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2020 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves