Tuesday, November 17, 2020

Mark Twain Supposedly Once Said That "History Doesn't Repeat Itself, But It Rhymes" & A Perfect Example Is Provided By Texas When The Loser Of The Gubernatorial Election Of 1873 Refused To Acknowledge His Defeat And The Lone Star State Was Left With Both A Governor And A Governor-Elect — Flash Forward To The 2020 US Presidential Election That Has Left Us With Both A President And A President-Elect And An Inauguration On January 21, 2021 With The Loser Refusing To Concede The Election

The people of Texas must have been dazed and confused with the contested result of the gubernatorial election of 1873 that left Texas with a losing governor who refused to accept defeat and the conundrum of two governors, both claiming the office. Considering the state of political affairs following the bitterly contested election of 2020, we are dazed and confused by the refusal of The *ILK/WPE (*Impeached But Not Removed) Lyin' King/Worst President Ever to concede the election result to the Dem candidate. If this is a (fair & balanced) occurence of US supremacy over Texas — in January 2021, we likely will have two presidents (a president and a president-elect) while in 1874, Texas only had two governors (a governor and a governor-elect), so be it. And, with vote recounts and no concession from the loser in the ongoing nightmare, the beat goes on....


[x YouTube]
"The Liar Tweets Tonight" (Parody of "The Lion Sleeps Tonight")
By Roy Zimmerman and The ReZisters, featuring Sandy Riccardi

[x WaPo — DC Fishwrap]
The Texas Governor Who Refused To Concede After Losing A Bitter Election
By Gillian Brockell

TagCrowd Cloud provides a visual summary of the blog post below

created at TagCrowd.com

The incumbent refused to concede. He had lost reelection, by a lot, but he claimed it was only because of election fraud. He appealed his case to the courts and called on militias to defend him.

No, this is not a story about President Trump, who still hasn’t publicly acknowledged his defeat in the election nearly two weeks ago. This is a story about a Texas governor who barricaded himself in the governor’s office and refused to give up control.

When Edmund J. Davis started out in politics in the 1850s, he was Whig. Then he became a Democrat. When the Civil War gripped the country, Davis — like then-Governor Sam Houston — opposed secession. He led a cavalry regiment for the Union during the war, fighting all over the South and witnessing Confederate General Edmund Kirby Smith’s surrender in Texas.

Davis’s wife and children were treated badly by Confederates, and Davis himself had narrowly escaped lynching only by the intervention of Mexico, according to historian and Davis biographer Carl Moneyhon. So when state constitutional conventions were held in 1866 and 1868 to 1869, Davis showed up with some personal and political bones to pick.

Now a Radical Republican representing the border region, Davis worked to block ex-Confederates (largely Democrats) from political power and expand voting rights to Black Texans. In 1869, he defeated a fellow Republican in the race for governor.

For a long time, Davis was depicted as a typical “Scalawag,” a derisive term for White Southerners who became Republicans during the Reconstruction era, supposedly out of self-interest. Moneyhon’s biography restores Davis’s reputation somewhat, pointing out he started public schooling in the state, stood up to police forces and further expanded civil rights for newly freed Black people.

When he ran for reelection in December 1872, ex-Confederates had regained the right to vote, and Davis got a Democratic opponent, Richard Coke. Voter intimidation, fraud and other irregularities occurred on both sides, to what degree is unclear. When Davis lost by a margin of 2 to 1, he declared the entire election invalid. The Texas Supreme Court agreed, but Democrats declared that, actually, the court was invalid.

In mid-January 1873, Coke arrived in Austin to assume the governorship. Davis locked himself inside the governor’s office in the Texas Capitol building; Coke and his supporters took over the second floor, where he took the oath of office.

For two days, there were two governors. Armed supporters for both men paced the streets, and violence seemed inevitable.

If Trump refuses to leave on Inauguration Day, as some have feared, President-elect Joe Biden’s campaign has said the government “is perfectly capable of escorting trespassers out of the White House.” That isn’t far off from what happened to Davis. When he summoned a local militia to protect him, it sided with Coke instead.

Davis then begged President Ulysses S. Grant, a fellow Republican, to send in federal troops. On January 17 came Grant’s reply: No federal troops, and “Would it not be prudent, as well as right, to yield to the verdict of the people as expressed by their ballots?”

Davis gave up, effectively ending Reconstruction in Texas. There wouldn’t be another Republican governor until party realignment 100 years later. But on his way out, he locked the door to the governor’s office and took the keys with him. Coke’s supporters busted it open with an ax. ###

[Gillian Brockell writes for The Washington Post's history blog, Retropolis. She has worked for The Post since 2013. As a video editor, she was nominated for an Emmy and won an National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) award for producing the commentary series “TL;DR.” Previously, she was a producer at Federal News Radio and a flight attendant for JetBlue Airways. Her writing has appeared in Cosmopolitan, Fodor's Travel and The Washington Post Magazine. Brockell received a BA (history and English) from The University of Texas at Austin and an MS (journalism) from Northwestern University (IL).]

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Post

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

Copyright © 2020 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.