Here's the idea of the day: The Dickster, VPOTUS 46, appeared at American University in DC last month and proclaimed, in defense of enhanced interrogation techniques (waterboarding), that “Some people called it torture. It wasn’t torture." This brazen nonsense brought a classic response from Senator Angus King (I-ME): "...Former Vice President... Cheney should give waterboarding a try himself if he doesn't believe the interrogation tactic qualifies as torture." Splendid idea for recreation at Gitmo, where The Dickster should be in an orange jumpsuit while serving an indeterminate sentence for crimes against humanity. The Dickster should receive a daily waterboarding session for the rest of his miserable days. With Cheney's cardiac history, a single waterboarding session should do the trick: the shock would stop his heart in a moment. Then, let him sleep with the fishes off the Cuban coast. If this is a (fair & balanced) desire for enhanced retribution, so be it.
Now We Know What's Being Done In Our Name
By Charles P. Pierce
Tag Cloud of the following piece of writing
We finally have been favored with the most inevitable leak in the history of the republic. Somebody's sent the Senate committee's report on the CIA's torture program, and its description of what was done in our name, out into the world. This will light a fire under some asses in the Executive branch, I'm thinking. It ought to get people thrown in jail. (h/t to Martin Longman for the PDF.)
Some of the report's other conclusions, which were obtained by McClatchy, include: the CIA used interrogation methods that weren't approved by the Justice Department or CIA headquarters; the agency impeded effective White House oversight and decision-making regarding the program; the CIA actively evaded or impeded congressional oversight of the program; the agency hindered oversight of the program by its own Inspector General's Office.
It is further evidence that nothing said by the heroes of our all-too-human, but curiously error-prone surveillance state about their activities can be trusted. Nothing. Ever. They lie for a living because their mission is a messianic one. They are contemptuous of democratic institutions, democratic norms, and any democratic spirit abroad in the people who pay their salaries and in whose name they carried out their crimes. If that skepticism is the most lasting result, that will be a good thing.
The investigation determined that the program produced very little intelligence of value and that the CIA misled the Bush White House, the Congress and the public about the effectiveness of the interrogation techniques, committee members have said. The techniques included waterboarding, which produces a sensation of drowning, stress positions, sleep deprivation for up to 11 days at a time, confinement in a cramped box, slaps and slamming detainees into walls. The CIA held detainees in secret "black site" prisons overseas and abducted others who it turned over to foreign governments for interrogation.
There is no question that these are crimes. There is no question that there are crimes that grew from the crimes. There is a severe test for the rule of law here, just as there was after the Bay of Pigs, and after the Church Committee hearings. Of course, Senator Dianne Feinstein, who had a couple of weeks in which she didn't seem to be entirely in the tank for the spooks, knows where the real problem with the leak lies.
Asked to comment on the findings, CIA spokesman Dean Boyd said: "Given the report remains classified, we are unable to comment. As we have stated previously, the CIA, in consultation with other agencies, will carry out an expeditious classification review of those portions of the final SSCI report submitted to the executive branch for review." Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein also declined to comment except to say: "If someone distributed any part of this classified report, they broke the law and should be prosecuted."
This is the debate that started with Edward Snowden, International Man Of Luggage. It's far beyond him now. What is more important for the government to keep its secrets or for the people to know what they need to know to govern themselves, and , about what was done in their name, and who makes the decision about where the "balance" lies. It cannot lie with the people who committed the crimes, not in this democracy. Ω
[Charles P. "Charlie" Pierce is a sportswriter, political blogger, author, and game show panelist. Pierce is the lead political blogger for Esquire, a position he has held since September 2011. He has written for Grantland, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Boston Globe Sunday Magazine, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Sports Illustrated, The National Sports Daily, GQ, and Slate. Pierce makes appearances on radio as a regular contributor to a pair of NPR programs: "Only A Game" and "Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!" He graduated from Marquette University (BA, Journalism).]
Copyright © 2014 Hearst Communications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2014 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves