Take a tour of the most successful religious group to originate in the United States: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day-Saints. The long and winding journey is deeply influenced by San Francisco free-lancer Avi Steinberg's non-authorized account of the origins and rise of the LDS Church in The Lost Book of Mormon (2014). If this is a (fair & balanced) effort to explain the unfathomable, so be it.
[x New Yorker]
In Search Of The Great American Bible
By Rollo Romig
Tag Cloud of the following piece of writing
Every man that writes is writing a new Bible, or a new Apocrypha; to last for a week or a thousand years,” the Scottish philosopher Thomas Carlyle recorded in his journal in 1832. Hyperbole, maybe, but on the other side of the Atlantic it seemed nearly true. Early nineteenth-century America was a time and place peculiarly receptive to new prophets and their books. Two lively cultural currents combined to make it so. One was the drive, in the heady early decades of the Republic, to create a uniquely American literature. The other was a national religious mania known as the Second Great Awakening, whose epicenter was western and central New York State. Between the Revolutionary and Civil Wars, countless revivals and new religions flared up from the Finger Lakes to Niagara Falls.
Many of the newer sects flamed out. The Shakers’ demise was no surprise, given their celibacy. The Oneida Community taught free love but lives on today only as a silverware company. Others persisted in new forms. The Millerites believed that Christ would reappear on October 22, 1844; their faith was severely challenged when that day passed without incident, though a version of Millerism survives with the Seventh Day Adventists. The most impressive and unlikely survivor from New York’s religious bumper crop is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. A hundred and fifty million copies of its central scripture have been printed since its first edition, in 1830. The Book of Mormon is where the literary and spiritual ambitions of the antebellum age most tenaciously converged.
And yet the Book of Mormon has excited very little enthusiasm outside of Mormonism. The typical reaction among the few non-Mormons who’ve read it is to deride it. (Mark Twain called The Book of Mormon “chloroform in print.”) One exception is Avi Steinberg, a self-described “fascinated nonbeliever,” who has spun his curiosity into a playful book titled The Lost Book of Mormon (2014). Steinberg nominates the Mormon scripture as a Great American Novel, or, failing that, as a priceless artifact from the Old, Weird America—a uniquely American product, like jazz music and superhero comics, that deserves our attention.
From the Vedas to Dianetics (1950, 2000, 2007), scripture is a literary category that defies genre. The body of texts variously held up as “scripture” include prophecies, biographies, letters, poems, songs, parables, laws, histories, dream diaries, genealogical lists, memoirs, and epics. Like the New Testament, the Book of Mormon is presented as a divinely inspired anthology, the mostly chronological record of a people from about 600 B.C. to about 400 A.D. (with one digression to a more ancient period). But the story of its compilation differs markedly from that of the New Testament: The religion’s founder, Joseph Smith, claimed that his source for the book was a set of gold plates that he’d excavated from a hillside; he credited himself as the text’s mere translator. And, according to a story told by Smith’s successor, Brigham Young, Smith was once permitted a glimpse into a secret cavern on that same hillside, which was chock full of further scriptures that weren’t ready to be revealed, “more plates than many wagon loads … piled up in the corners and along the walls.” The scholar Laurie F. Maffly-Kipp, in her introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of the Book of Mormon, writes that the book’s very existence “implied (and the narrative itself stated) that there were many records still to be discerned. God was once again speaking to his people, and the canon of scripture had therefore been reopened.”
As for Steinberg, the genre he’s chosen for The Lost Book of Mormon is mostly travelogue. His first stop is Jerusalem, where he struggles to find a local copy of the Book of Mormon. (It has received official translations into scores of languages, but Hebrew is not among them.) Jerusalem is where the Book of Mormon begins, and it starts with a murder: One desperate night near the city walls, the Mormon prophet Nephi, a contemporary of the Old Testament’s Jeremiah, must kill his wicked relative Laban in order to recover a precious family book written on plates of brass. Steinberg is struck, as many have been before him, by just how small the Holy Land is. “The great kings of the Bible were in fact small-time clan leaders; the grand battles more closely resembled shepherd’s squabbles,” he writes. Most scriptural characters show up only passingly in secular history. (The non-Biblical prophets in the Book of Mormon don’t appear in historical records at all.) The prophets’ visions transform backwaters into grand landscapes—perhaps precisely because the places they’re from are small. “The lavishness of a biblical imagination,” Steinberg writes, “is sometimes born out of a poverty of space and resources, from a poor person’s urgent need to amplify.”
Steinberg rarely quotes directly from the Book of Mormon, which seemed odd until I tried to read it myself. As exciting as the plot sounds in paraphrase, the actual text smothers it in so many King Jamesian locutions that it’s barely discernable. No one’s ever claimed that the Book of Mormon rivals the literary achievements of the Bible or the poetic grace of the Koran in Arabic, but I was still surprised by the tedium. Of course, scriptures are often a hard slog for non-believers. Their unsettled position between fiction and nonfiction leaves the secular reader wondering: How am I supposed to take this stuff? As myth? Metaphor? Historical novel? Hallucination? Even the religious sometimes give the actual reading of scripture a pass. (I know a former Catholic seminarian who admitted that he’s never read the Bible in its entirety.)
In the case of the Book of Mormon, only in 1986 did a prophet, Ezra Taft Benson, order that Mormons study the book closely. “The drama of authorship, of the book’s discovery and its translation,” Steinberg writes, “was for many years the story, the thing that bewitched readers, the thing that made people’s blood boil.” The fact of its existence—an original American scripture—mattered more to its early audience than the narrative it contained. As it happens, that narrative takes place largely in Mesoamerica, and for some current-day Mormons, Mayan ruins have become a place of pilgrimage. Many centuries before Columbus, the Book of Mormon tells us, ocean-faring Hebrews set sail from Jerusalem and landed in Mesoamerica. In The Lost Book of Mormon, Steinberg tags along with a tour group to Guatemala and southern Mexico—or, as the Book calls them, the Lands of Nephi and Zarahemla.
A visit to the National Museum of Guatemala offers a fascinating glimpse of Mormon exegesis at work in the field. In one gallery, on a Mayan altar adorned with symbols, a tour guide points out a glyph that could be interpreted as meaning “and it came to pass.” To the pilgrims, this is hugely significant, because “and it came to pass” is the most famous recurring phrase in the Book of Mormon, with a thousand three hundred and eighty-one appearances. Few paragraphs begin without it. To Mormon detractors, Steinberg notes, it’s a telling verbal tic that strongly suggests “a weak ventriloquism of biblical idiom.” For believers, the incessant repetition of the phrase is “like a charming quirk of one’s beloved.” And, more than that, it’s a sign—it must be, given that it appears in scripture. To readers of faith, Steinberg writes, “everything, every mystery, every slightly odd detail, would eventually reveal something.”
Only scripture inspires this kind of extreme explication, the sense that every aspect of the text most certainly “means” something, even on the most meta levels. (Scripture itself often encourages this approach: the Koran notes that while the interpretation of some of its verses is straightforward, others have “hidden meanings” known only to God.) It’s the only literary form for which every letter and number is routinely scrutinized for esoteric messages, using methods ranging from gematria to theomatics to Koranic symmetry to Equidistant Letter Sequences. For the scripture-skeptical, such wordplay only fuels a suspicion that believers are incapable of engaging with their texts without grasping for rationalization. If God really wants to speak to us, why would he use as his medium vague and contradictory books full of cryptic literary games? Why leave so much room for tragic misunderstanding among your stupidest and most violent followers? For the nonbeliever, there’s no satisfying answer to these questions—they’re proof of the texts’ deeply human limitations.
But the obscurity of scripture does go a long way toward explaining its persistent appeal. Paraphrasing the Kabbalah scholar Gershom Scholem, Steinberg notes that the very definition of a prophetic text is “a story that can generate endless meanings, endless interpretations, a story that isn’t limited in time or place to one particular interpretation and that is frankly weird and plastic and unrealistic enough—yet also plausible enough—for all readings of it to be simultaneously true…. Despite a history of dogmatic readings, prophetic stories are those that actually push against dogmatic reading. That’s what makes them perpetually relevant.”
As a mythic text, the Book of Mormon had the disadvantage of arriving after the scientific revolution, exposing it to literal-minded derision from the moment of its publication. The twenty-first century has seen a stiffening of literalism among believers and nonbelievers alike—an insistence that all writing must be classified as either fact or fiction, no gray allowed. For serious Biblical scholars, truth is a nuanced affair; contrary to popular understanding, inerrancy, infallibility, and literalism are all distinct positions. The fashionableness of a fact-or-fiction binary puts avowed believers on the defensive, forcing them to choose between admitting to ridiculous-sounding convictions or denying their faith. See, for example, the debate, a couple of years ago, when Richard Dawkins tried to corner the Muslim journalist Mehdi Hasan by asking him if he believed that Muhammad ascended to heaven on a winged horse. Hasan admitted that he did, opening himself up to a world of ridicule. Neither of them seemed to grant that “yes” and “no” are not the only possible answers to such a question. But both believers and atheists have been conditioned to read only evasiveness in more complicated answers. This seems to me a significant cultural loss. Steinberg, a nonbelieving reader of the Book of Mormon, has no interest in trying to “bust” anyone who does believe. He understands how myth works.
Most of the rest of Steinberg’s book takes place at Hill Cumorah, New York, where Joseph Smith said that he’d unearthed the gold tablets of the Book of Mormon, and where Steinberg attempted to participate in an weeklong pageant of the book’s story, which Mormons stage each year. Scripture is far from the only kind of writing that inspires such productions; there’s an ever-growing roster of Bloomsday events commemorating Joyce’s Ulysses and the Wizard Rock scene surrounding the Harry Potter novels, not to mention the entire industry of Hollywood adaptations. Readers have always itched to extrapolate the imaginary worlds of the books they love into flesh-and-blood pageantry. An active fan club is not what makes scripture distinct.
Throughout The Lost Book of Mormon, Steinberg marvels at the trials Joseph Smith went through to write and publish his bible. He reported that it took him years and much physical effort to successfully extract his gold plates from Hill Cumorah; once he did, it took him years again to translate them, a process that required hiding the plates in a stovepipe hat, staring at their inscrutable runes through divining stones, and dictating the results to a series of scribes. One of those scribes, Martin Harris, entrusted the first 116 pages of the manuscript—the entire Book of Lehi—with his skeptical wife, Lucy. They were lost forever. “I’ve always found that part of the story particularly compelling,” Steinberg writes. “Even with the direct intervention of heaven-sent angels, with the aid of powerful magic and clairvoyance, producing a book turns out to be an unbelievable pain in the ass. That seems very true to life.” Ω
[Rollo Romig is a regular contributor to The New Yorker. He received a BA from Columbia College in Chicago and an MA from New York University. He was the recipient of the Roy Rowan Scholarship in 2008 from the Overseas Press Club Foundation.]
Copyright © 2015 Condé Nast Digital
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..
Copyright © 2015 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves
