Friday, August 29, 2003

Corrections From Wisconsin

I stand corrected by Tom Terrific (aka Fightin' T). I had no idea that newspapers were ideologically biased. It is obvious that I am an innocent. Capitol Crimes? Geez.

That is really negative language. Well, Tom's point is well taken. I have no business pontificating about newspapers in Wisonsin. Here in Texas, all of the newspapers are centrist without bias right or left. If you believe that I have some beachfront property in AZ that I want to show you. Anyway, I now know the difference between the Madison State Journal and the Madison Capitol Times. It is amazing that Madison has two daily newspapers. In most non-mega-markets, there is now a sole fishwrap. I tell my students that the sole source of information in the world is the Amarillo News-Globe. If this be (fair & balanced) journalism, make the most of it.



Fightin' T in Wisconsin wrote on Friday, August 29, 2003

Neil,

That article on W I forwarded to you was from the CAPITOL TIMES, not the WSJ. I don't forward any editorials from the WSJ because it is a Republican newspaper and they aren't saying anything good or bad about W or the war. They're focused on "really important" issues like all of the Harley riders in Wisconsin this week.

The CAPITOL TIMES is the afternoon Madison newspaper that was created by William T. Evehue back in the early 20th C. He was a big supporter of "Fighting Bob" and the other LaFollette boys. He switched to the Democratic Party in the late 1930s after Phil and Bob, Jrs. failed attempt to revitalize the Progressive Party. Since then, the CAPITOL TIMES (also called the Crapitol Crimes by conservatives) has been the leading liberal/progressive paper in Wisconsin.

Dave Zwiefel, the present editor, is from Evansville, Wisconsin where I graduated from high school. His parents ran the bowling alley there where I hung out with the boys.

Sorry to hear you're giving up on college football. I look it as the AAA league for developing NFL players. How else could minority males get into major colleges, especially with affirmative action under the gun? Unfortunately, getting out of the colleges with a degree isn't a priority. One of my daughter's friends from college was Cecil Martin who graduated in four years. He was then and still is a class guy and is still the starting fullback for the Philadelphia NRA Eagles.

Great articles in "Rants and Raves" this week. I'll be in the North woods for the next week or so and will catch up when I get back.

Have a relaxing Labor Day weekend.

Eminilio P. Rospaglokus

My Favorite College-Life Movie

It's funny, but it never occurred to me, but jocks had NO prominent role in "National Lampoon's Animal House." The protagonists were rival frat members, ROTC wackos, the funniest dean (Dean Wormer) in the history of comic villains, sorority girls, and the like. No jocks that I can remember. If ever there was a group to lampoon, it would have been the jocks at Faber College. Yet, the portrayal of Faber College was one without athletics. Wonder why? Perhaps jocks were too easy? Perhaps college athletics ain't that funny? If this be (fair & balanced) film criticism, so be it!


[x NYTimes]

August 25, 2003

Revisiting Faber College (Toga, Toga, Toga!)

By ELVIS MITCHELL


As unlikely as it may seem, "National Lampoon's Animal House" is one of the most influential movies of the last 25 years, inspiring a cottage industry of subversive film comedies that have flourished at the edge of the mainstream. This year alone, two of its imitators did impressive box-office business: "American Wedding," the third movie in the "American Pie" series, and "Old School," which is basically an updating of the original.

With a cast of nearly unknown actors, including Kevin Bacon in his first screen role, "Animal House" was released in 1978, when the fraternity life was the existence that dared not speak its name. Not so coincidentally, a DVD festooned with extras will be released tomorrow to cash in on, er, celebrate the film's 25th anniversary.

Set in 1962 at fictional Faber College — an institution of higher learning apparently named after a pencil — "Animal House" follows the scourges of the campus, the amiable, hard-partying reprobates of the Delta House fraternity who view the perquisites of frat life as rights rather than as privileges. Those rights include the duty to defame and undermine the status quo at all costs — essentially to extend childhood.

The movie's impressive box-office grosses — more than $140 million in North America — inspired a school of slavish mimicry with fare that reacted to honey-roasted and sentimentalized movie takes on youth like "American Graffiti," from 1973. Such imitations usually lacked the subversive anger of "Animal House" and the ingenuity of its script. One of the many sharp-reflex innovations of "Animal House" was that it was the first film to parody the damp, whatever-happened-to material that "Graffiti" ended with.

"Animal House" was written by Douglas Kenney, an alumnus of The Harvard Lampoon who was also a founding editor of National Lampoon magazine; Chris Miller; and Harold Ramis, an alumnus of the Second City comedy troupe in Chicago. (Mr. Ramis went on to help write the scripts for "Stripes"; the "Ghostbusters" movies; "Back to School," an "Animal House" descendant, with Rodney Dangerfield; and "Caddyshack," which he directed. He also directed "Groundhog Day" in 1993 and "Analyze This" in 1999.)

John Belushi — a fellow Second City member, and more notably a member of the first cast of "Saturday Night Live" — became a national treasure in his "Animal House" role as Bluto, which he played as a barnyard version of a silent-movie comedian.

"Animal House" had its own antecedents. There were college-circuit pictures like "The Kentucky Fried Movie," a 1977 picture that was essentially a series of skits. Its director, John Landis, was enlisted to make "Animal House." The ground had also been broken by Robert Altman's "MASH," and like "MASH," "Animal House" had the arrogance of the counterculture.

But there were rumors that the original script for "Animal House" carried blithe notes of misogyny and racism, that it veered closer to the exclusionary cruelty of National Lampoon than to the antibureaucracy thrust of "MASH." Mr. Landis, a raconteur who seems to speak in italics, concedes the truth in those rumors.

"The first script was very rough and offensive," he said in a telephone interview from Los Angeles, "but it was also very, very funny. I mean, everybody in the original script was a pig. There was a lot of projectile vomiting — and, by the way, I have nothing against projectile vomiting."

Mr. Landis said that he was originally hired to supervise a rewrite of the script, but he gave all credit to the screenwriters. "Doug and Chris and Harold did a brilliant job," he said. "especially Doug. That screenplay has never really been given the credit it should get. It's extremely literate, and very funny."

He went on: "My major contribution was making it good guys versus bad guys instead of just all bad guys, though the heroes are antiheroes. I went to a lot of fraternities for research, and I was singularly unimpressed. I'm a child of the 1960's — I was born in 1950 — and the whole fraternity thing was totally alien to me. The fraternity wasn't dead, but it was dying. I thought, well, let's think of all the positive aspects of fraternity, which was basically family, and give that to the Deltas. And put all of the negatives, basically Nazis, and put that in the other house."

Mr. Landis acknowledged that there were similarities to "MASH," but added that there were even earlier signposts leading to "Animal House."

"When you look at the classic Hollywood comedies, there had always been college comedies," he said. "In the silents there was Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd. In the 30's there were not only all those Jack Oakie pictures, but the Marx Brothers made a college film. When I got the opportunity to make this picture — and this was me thinking, `I don't know what anybody else's intention was' — I set out to make a fairly classic college comedy. And though it didn't have Jack Oakie and Rudy Vallee in fur coats, it had John Belushi and Tim Matheson."

"Animal House" echoes the anarchic spirit of the college comedies Mr. Landis adopted as a model, but it also reflects a choice he made that the empty hedonistic "House" counterfeiters have missed: he softened the script, muting its National Lampoon ruthlessness.

"Here's an example of the kind of changes I did that were not in the script," Mr. Landis said, referring to a scene in which the Deltas abandon their dates at a bar where they felt threatened. "You see the boys running away and ditching the girls. Afterward, you then see the girls walking home and going, `Ew! He was terrible.' I just made up that scene at the moment, and it was my own basic liberal thing. I thought, `I have to show that these girls are safe.' "

He added, now speaking of an infamous voyeuristic scene in the film: "It's very much like the scene of Belushi looking in the window at those girls. People went, `Yikes!' I'm shooting over John's shoulder as he's looking at these topless girls and I'm thinking: `This is so shameless. How do I fix it?' And I was inspired at that moment to take advantage of Belushi's brilliant empathy and sympathy. I made him turn, look into the camera and make everybody a co-conspirator. And John was able to do that with just an eyebrow."

The movie also reflects the summer-camp experience of its making. One feature of the DVD is a documentary showing the on-set camaraderie. "There's even footage I'd never seen that they got from a TV station in Eugene, Ore., of us fooling around on the set," Mr. Landis said. "And in that you can see it was a really good experience for everyone. There is one great scene, where the actors talk about going to a frat house, and it turned into a brawl. All the frat boys wanted to beat up the Hollywood actors."

"It's been 25 years, which has given me a lot of time to think about it, and my theory now," Landis said with a laugh, sounding dangerously close to reflective, "is that the movie's extremely romantic. Remember, our fathers' generation used to talk about World War II as the best years of their lives. Why do people romanticize the military and romanticize college? You're 18, and you're out of the house. There's a great line in `Animal House': `We can do anything we want. We're college students!' In addition to everything else, the movie somehow captures that sense of youthful exuberance and excitement, of being out there in the world. Everyone, no matter if they're yellow, black or white, Commie or evangelical Christian, comes up and says: `That was my house. That was my college experience.' "



Copyright © 2003 The New York Times Company

Movin' Out

Maurice Clarett, Rick Neuhisel, Mike Price, Miami & Virginia Tech, Rashidi Wheeler, and the University of Nebraska. All of these are reasons I won't be watching college football this fall. I probably won't watch the NFL, either. The whole mess makes me sick. Close to my revulsion for W. The worst is the University of Nebraska. The budget crisis in Nebraska has cost 15 tenured professors their jobs. Yet, the University of Nebraska paid more than $200K in performance bonuses to its football coaches this year. The achievement of Coach Frank Solich's staff? Finishing 7-7 in 2002. The worst record in Nebraska football in more than 30 years! We are living in a funhouse world where up is down, stupid is smart, and greed is good. If somebody out there wants to watch Maurice Clarett, power to 'em. If someone out there wants to watch Kobe Bryant, power to 'em. If someone wants to read O. J. Simpson's interview in Playboy, power to 'em. If someone wants to watch steroid-raging animals tear someone's leg off, power to 'em. As Billy Joel sings, "If that's movin' up, then I'm movin' out!" If this be (fair & balanced) revulsion, so be it.


[NYTimes]

August 29, 2003

Old Issues and New Voices

By JOE DRAPE

EVANSTON, Ill. - Mark Murphy earned All-Pro honors and a Super Bowl ring as member of the Washington Redskins. He acknowledges that most of his teammates neither graduated from college nor really cared about doing so.

After retiring from the N.F.L. in 1985, Murphy worked for the players' union, where he tried to help former players go back to school and make a new life away from the locker room.

In May, he took on a new challenge, becoming athletic director at Northwestern University. One of the country's elite academic institutions, Northwestern also plays intercollegiate sports in the Big Ten, a conference rich with influence and power.

It is here, along the shores of Lake Michigan, that Murphy will try to do something that many believe is becoming impossible: attract talented athletes who can consistently win on the field, excel in the classroom and become leaders beyond football.

"What I'd like nothing better than to do is for Northwestern to do everything the right way and consistently win," Murphy said. "What are our chances of that happening? I'd say 50-50."

Indeed, as a new season begins, college football is at a crossroads, brought there by a series of scandals involving players and coaches, an increasingly vocal reform movement and an internal struggle between the haves and have-nots. Many of the issues are not new, but fresh voices like Murphy's are sparking renewed activism.

Questions are being raised: Who controls the National Collegiate Athletic Association? Should institutions be rewarded for demonstrating that they are actually educating their athletes? Should athletes be paid? Should coaches be disciplined more vigorously?

"I think in terms of the behavioral aspect it's good news/bad news," said Myles Brand, the N.C.A.A. president. "There is trouble in paradise. The good news is that presidents and trustees are standing up and taking strong stands against students and coaches. It used to be this kind of stuff was pushed under the table."

Among the issues on display are these:

¶Ohio State suspended running back Maurice Clarett for an indefinite number of games while the N.C.A.A. investigates his role in an exaggerated car theft report.

¶Washington fired Rick Neuheisel as coach in June for gambling in an N.C.A.A. basketball pool and then lying about it. Now Neuheisel is suing the university and the N.C.A.A., alleging he was wrongfully fired because Washington wanted to avoid an N.C.A.A. investigation. Washington begins the season with Keith Gilbertson as coach.

¶Alabama also dismissed a coach, Mike Price, and begins a second season on probation for recruiting violations. Price was hired away from Washington State, but before he coached a game for the Crimson Tide he was dismissed for his behavior at a Florida strip club. Mike Shula was hired in May to replace him.

¶The Big East and the Atlantic Coast Conference begin their last seasons with their current structures after a summer marred by allegations of tampering, back-room deals, broken promises and bait-and-switch tactics. Miami and Virginia Tech ultimately jumped from the Big East to the A.C.C.

For Brand, the misconduct of coaches is at once the most vexing problem to solve and the easiest. Noting that nearly 20 Division I-A coaches make more than $1 million annually, Brand said it was time they be held accountable.

"We seem to be giving higher and higher salaries to coaches and the expectations have become higher and higher and they are not paying attention," Brand said. "We have to ferret out these instances of bad behavior and get the bad actors out of there."

But money is as much a part of the reform movement as is a desire to maintain academic or institutional integrity. Forty-four presidents from colleges in the smaller conferences have banded together as the Presidential Coalition for Athletics Reform and have starkly drawn their differences with their counterparts at major football colleges.

The coalition says the big colleges not only get the money, but also have hijacked the N.C.A.A.'s governance structure and make all the rules. While the Southeastern Conference, the Atlantic Coast Conference, the Big East, the Pacific-10, the Big 12, the Big Ten and Notre Dame will split $900 million over the eight years of the Bowl Championship Series contract, which runs through 2005, the coalition schools will split just $42 million over that period.

"It is true that many of us have been distressed that there are schools that are participating in postseason play, whether it be football or basketball, who have really embarrassing graduation rates of their student-athletes," said Scott S. Cowen, the president of Tulane, a coalition member. "Yet they are allowed to participate in high-visibility, high-revenue-sharing events."

Last year, for example, at 25 of 55 universities competing in bowl games, the graduation rate of football players was 10 to 20 percentage points lower than the university's overall graduation rate for student-athletes, says a study by the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida. (Air Force was the 56th team and, like all service academies, does not release graduation statistics.)

While six of the eight teams that competed in the four B.C.S. bowls - worth about $13.5 million per team - had a graduation rate of more than 45 percent, the B.C.S. champion, Ohio State, had a graduation rate of 36 percent, and the Rose Bowl victor, Oklahoma, only 26 percent, according to the study, which was based on N.C.A.A. data. (The full report is on the institute's Web site, www.bus.ucf.edu/sport/ides/.)

Even before Murphy's arrival at Northwestern, he practiced what he preached. While playing pro football he attended night classes at American University, earning a Master of Business Administration degree, and later he received a law degree from Georgetown University. He worked as a prosecutor for the Department of Justice and then as athletic director for 11 years at Colgate, his alma mater.

Northwestern had already demonstrated that high graduation rates and football standings can coexist: the Wildcats have won or shared three Big Ten titles in the last 10 years and have maintained a graduation rate that has exceeded 85 percent, reaching 100 percent in some years.

But Northwestern has not been untouched by scandal. Over that same period, six former football and basketball players pleaded guilty to charges related to an investigation into sports betting at the university. The family of Rashidi Wheeler, a football player who collapsed and died in a voluntary conditioning program in summer 2001, filed a wrongful-death suit. And Northwestern acknowledged in response to the suit that more than eight football players had used supplements banned by the N.C.A.A.

Murphy believes that Northwestern is committed to honoring the highest academic and ethical standards. But he wonders if enough coaches and administrators at other Division I-A colleges are.

"Money has blurred the line, and it makes some schools ignore things when the revenues are going up," Murphy said. "Schools are not insisting that their athletes get an education."

The N.C.A.A.'s so-called incentive/disincentive plan, to be put into effect incrementally from 2005 to 2008, is intended to change that. Teams that don't perform well academically could lose scholarships and be banned from postseason play, potentially losing millions in revenue. Teams that perform well in the classroom, on the other hand, may be entitled to additional revenue through the N.C.A.A.'s distribution formula, pick up more scholarships and receive other benefits like more graduate assistant coaches.

"The goal here is to hold the coaches and the athletic department and the universities accountable," Brand said. "We want them to give student-athletes every opportunity to graduate, and if you're not, we're going to sanction you."

But some critics say the N.C.A.A. needs less bureaucracy to transform college football. These critics want to begin by taking the shackles off those they see as responsible for the increased revenue: the student-athletes.

Last spring in the Nebraska Legislature, State Senator Ernie Chambers sponsored a successful bill that would allow the University of Nebraska to pay some athletes if four other states with Big 12 programs passed similar laws. He said his intention was never to have players actually paid, but to pressure the N.C.A.A. to increase scholarships and other aid and to offer greater opportunities to earn money through outside work.

"The maximum amount of aid is less than the cost of attending college, when you account for clothes and food," Senator Chambers said. "Yet needy players are attending college and are getting money from someplace. And what they learn is to ignore the rules - look the other way and keep your mouth shut."

There is a growing constituency of coaches and even university presidents who believe that players deserve a bigger piece of the pie.

"It's a point of frustration for the student-athlete, especially the football and basketball players," said Mack Brown, the football coach at Texas. "With the state of college sports and the professionalism involved in it right now, with television and revenue production, I'd like to see some of it going back to the student-athletes."

Brand said he was firmly against the notion.

For Murphy at Northwestern, educating players, not paying them, is the key to restoring order in college football. As a player who defied the staggering odds of making the N.F.L., he witnessed career-ending injuries and the sad spectacle of a former Redskins teammate, Dexter Manley, tearfully telling a Senate committee that he did not learn to read until the age of 29 despite playing football at Oklahoma State for four years.

As a member of the N.F.L. players' union, he also saw how dim the prospects after football could be for players without degrees. At Colgate, Murphy watched the football team make three consecutive appearances in the N.C.A.A.'s Division I-AA playoffs and the men's basketball team make two appearances in the N.C.A.A. tournament. He also saw 87 percent of Colgate's student-athletes graduate. Now, with an athletic department budget at Northwestern that is $33 million - or three times that of Colgate's - he sees an opportunity to be a role model for what intercollegiate athletics should be.

"One of the things that frustrated me at Colgate over the years is that faculty members would take student-athletes aside and say, 'You have to make a choice - you can't excel both academically and athletically,' " Murphy said. "I think you can."

Copyright © 2003 The New York Times Company