Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Smirking And Winking Toward Gomorrah

I watched Dub for the last time in his smirk- and wink-filled State of the Union address on Tuesday night. The smartass fratboy is going to take us down the tubes. "Addicted to oil" was a real hoot. That sumbitch has been addicted to oil all of his miserable life. His daddy (Poppy or 41) was in the oil bidness in Midland, TX while Dub was "growing up." When Dub finally struck out on his own, it was in the oil bidness. He and The Dickster convened a Star Chamber assemblage of Big Oil goons to map out an "national energy policy" early in Dub's first term. We still don't know the names of the participants who were making national policy because Dub and The Dickster (another oil junkie) invoked executive privilege over that public information. However, I am convinced that Dub is addicted to stupidity, not oil. The stock-in-trade for all fratboys is bullshit and Dub is a masterful bullshitter. If this is (fair & balanced) prevarication, so be it.

[x Salon]
"A failed and oppressive state 7,000 miles away"
By Tim Grieve

Were we the only ones reaching for a map during the president's State of the Union address?

As he discussed his international war on tyranny Tuesday night, George W. Bush said: "On Sept. 11, 2001, we found that problems originating in a failed and oppressive state 7,000 miles away could bring murder and destruction to our country."

If presidential speeches were game shows, it wouldn't be a bad way to put it. "Excuses for Unpopular Wars for $200, Alex." But if the answer is "a failed and oppressive state 7,000 miles away whose problems brought murder and destruction to the United States on 9/11," well, what exactly is the question?

Could it be, "What is Saudi Arabia?" Fifteen of the 19 hijackers who attacked the United States on 9/11 were Saudi citizens, and their leader, Osama bin Laden, was born in Saudi Arabia and seethes with resentment directed at the Saudi government. And Riyadh is a close-enough-for-government-work 6,744 miles from Washington, D.C. But the Bush administration has never been too interested in linking 9/11 with Saudi Arabia, and we're betting that Bush didn't mean to do so Tuesday night.

So could it be, "What is Iraq?" The president would be happy to have you think so -- his vague description, followed immediately, as it was, by a discussion of "dictators" who "seek weapons of mass destuction," pretty much invited those who have been conditioned to make a mental link between Iraq and al-Qaida to do so again. But Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and Baghdad is only 6,200 miles from Washington.

Well, then, could it be, "What is Afghanistan?" It's a stretch to say that "problems originating" in Afghanistan led to 9/11. While the Taliban provided a safe haven for al-Qaida, the "problems" that gave way to 9/11 weren't born in Afghanistan. The "oppressive" Taliban government didn't create al-Qaida. Bin Laden did that, and he did it almost a decade before he moved his base of operations to Afghanistan. But Afghanistan is the best choice geographically speaking -- Kabul is 6,924 miles from Washington -- and it's probably the country Bush had in his mind, even as he hoped that you'd keep Iraq in yours.

Tim Grieve writes about politics for Salon. His blog/column — War Room — appears in the online version of Salon.

Copyright © 2006 Salon.com


Really Simple Syndication
Get an RSS (Really Simple Syndication) Reader at no cost from Google at Google Reader. Another free Reader is available at RSS Reader.

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.