As if the silly season wasn't wacky enough, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) has beseeched the POTUS (44) to invite the Boise State football team to the White House at the same as time as the University of Alabama football team arrives to be saluted as the national champeens of the 2009 football season. Hatch has enmity toward the system that crowned Alabama as national champs because, in previous years, undefeated college teams from Utah (the original "U" — University of Utah and the "Y" — Brigham Young Univesrity) were snubbed by the system. This year, the 2009 football season produced two undefeated Division I football teams: the University of Alabama and Boise State University. The POTUS (44) is already on record as a critic of the current system for determining a national champeen, but early comments from the White House indicate that Boise State won't be invited. Idaho voted Red in 2008, but so did Alabama. The best solution for the POTUS (44)? Invite neither team to the White House. If this is a (fair & balanced) silly suggestion in the silly season, so be it.
[x The Atlantic]
Coaches Gone Wild
By Gary Andrew Poole
Tag Cloud of the following article
As we near the end of college football’s Bowl Madness, culminating this week with the national title clash between the University of Texas Longhorns and the University of Alabama Crimson Tide, the striking thing is what people are talking about. Sure, there’s some chatter about I-formations and the spread option, but the real excitement is off the field. And most of it involves crazed coaches.
Just last week, Texas Tech coach Mike Leach was fired after he was accused of locking a student-athlete in an equipment shed because the player complained about a concussion; the University of Tennessee used co-eds to entice high school recruits; Mark Mangino, the consensus national coach of the year at Kansas two years ago, resigned amid allegations that he mistreated his players—he reportedly told a former player, whose younger brother was once shot in the arm as a child in St. Louis, that “if you don't shut up, I'm going to send you back to St. Louis so you can get shot with your homies”; and the University of Southern California’s star tailback is under investigation because a booster allegedly loaned him a Range Rover, which the player regularly drove to practice. (Leach’s defenders say Texas Tech administrators exaggerated the incident and fired him so it wouldn’t have to pay the coach a $800,000 bonus; Mangino denied any wrongdoing and reached a settlement with the University of Kansas, which dropped its investigation into Mangino’s physical and mental abuse of players.)
For more than a hundred years, college football has been a delightful combination of pageantry and impurity, but this season has been particularly crass. So it seems fitting the week will end with yet another uniquely American absurdity: the BCS Championship game, sponsored by Citi, which received $20 billion from taxpayers in TARP bailout money but refuses to disclose the amount it pays for a “media buy” as a BCS title sponsor. Even so, the company may not get its money’s worth. There are a chorus of football fans—a generally impassioned lot—who view the contest with growing apathy. According to a recent poll from Quinnipiac University, 63 percent of Americans who identify themselves as college football fans want to junk the current Bowl Championship Series (BCS) to pick a national champion and replace it with a playoff system like the NCAA basketball tournament. (Even President Obama weighed in last year, saying the current system of deciding a champion is flawed.)
Until almost two decades ago, the top team was decided by polls of coaches and sportswriters. It was a lousy way to choose a national champ, but it never pretended to be more than what it was. In the mid-1990s, fans finally demanded a true playoff system. Then the most prestigious conferences and their national broadcast partners did an end-around run by bundling lucrative bowl games with broadcast rights—ESPN has agreed to pay $125 million a year to broadcast the Orange, Fiesta and Sugar bowls from 2011-2014, and the BCS National Championship game through 2013. In most sports, teams play games throughout a season and their records determine their chances of participating in a post-season tournament, but in the BCS a mathematical formula (subjective polls of writers and coaches, computer rankings, the teams' records, and a strength-of-schedule index) determines the top teams. Eleven college conferences participate in Division One football, but of those only six are guaranteed spots in the four BCS games at the conclusion of the year. (Notre Dame - which is unaffiliated with any conference but is a popular team - still receives $1.4 million from the BCS annually, and can participate in a BCS bowl if it is rated high enough in the BCS ranking system.) The ten teams selected for bowl games include the conference champion from each of the six BCS conferences plus four others. Each participating conference in the final game receives an additional $18.5 million.
All of this money, which is controlled by the select few, has corrupted college football, turning one of our most sacred athletic rituals into something that most people can’t even understand. The machinations of determining a champion are so convoluted that it seems, to average fans, that the fix is in. The BCS system also makes it impossible for smaller schools to compete for the crown—both Northeastern and Hofstra universities folded their football teams last season, citing rising costs and a lack of interest. Meantime, the pressure on BCS college coaches, usually the highest paid university employees, takes a toll: Urban Meyer, Florida’s coach who won last season’s national title, was hospitalized last month after suffering chest pains brought on by panic attacks.
To help bring an end to the BCS, Joe Barton, a Texas Republican in the House of Representatives, introduced a bill that passed a subcommittee in December. The legislation would have about as much effect as a safety blitz against a well-timed screen pass; it merely prevents the BCS from calling its title game a “national championship game” unless it is the result of a playoff system. “It's like communism, you can't fix it,” Barton has said. While this bill is silly, there is plenty of worry among the universities that make up the beleaguered BCS. They recently hired Ari Fleischer, President George W. Bush’s press secretary, to improve their image with unhappy fans.
Like everyone else, from presidents to peons, I’ve watched bowl games since I was a kid and I enjoy being saturated with college football for a week or so. For almost a century, starting in the 1920s when all the large college football stadiums started being built, college football has been about big money and big drama. But football has a deeper meaning to us than mere entertainment. From the time of Theodore Roosevelt, college football has been seen as a maker of men (Roosevelt loved the game, believing the “rough, manly” sport created a better nation, but forewarned that the game should not degenerate into the “sole end of one’s existence.”) The BCS has eroded one of the great American sports, creating an atmosphere in which coaches go wild, underdogs have no shot, and corporate interests rule the game, ruining the very ideal of sport: fairness. A playoff system might bring it all back to some sort of semi-reality.
So when the Texas or Alabama players hold up the $30,000 Waterford Crystal football trophy and call themselves champions on Thursday night, millions of people will watch, and many will see right through it. Ω
[Gary Andrew Poole has written for the New York Times, Time, GQ, USA Today, Wired, Atlantic Monthly, and other periodicals. He graduated from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. Poole's most recent book is The Galloping Ghost: Red Grange, An American Football Legend (2008).]
Copyright © 2010 The Atlantic Monthly Group
Get the Google Reader at no cost from Google. Click on this link to go on a tour of the Google Reader. If you read a lot of blogs, load Reader with your regular sites, then check them all on one page. The Reader's share function lets you publicize your favorite posts.
Copyright © 2010 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves
No comments:
Post a Comment
☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!
Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.