Saturday, August 21, 2010

Despite Ourselves?

The Dumbos and the Teabaggers are racists. Every word that they utter originates in the black hole of prejudice and hatred that they call their mind. When it comes to appealing to the stupidity of the masses, the Dumbos and their ilk are aided and abetted by Faux News, which puts Julius Streicher's Der Stürmer from the days of Nazi Germany to shame. It is time to call the Dumbos what they are: racists and anti-Semites wrapped in the Stars & Stripes. If this is a (fair & balanced) call for national purification, so be it.

[x The Nation]
Obama, The Right And Race
By Salim Muwakkil

Tag Cloud of the following article

created at

Reading Eric Alterman's comprehensive anatomy of the conservative conquest of America did much to reinforce my sense of dread. His account helps clarify the enormity of the challenges facing those working toward building a society more concerned with social justice than with the bottom line. He is particularly deft in outlining the corrupting power of money and lobbyists and how ossified political and media structures stand in the way of progressive change.

What seems to be missing in Alterman's historical summary, however, is the centrality of the "Southern Strategy" and the Republicans' canny exploitation of racial resentment. I can understand his reluctance to address this issue; disentangling strands of racial bias from the libertarian tradition of American populism can be a thankless task, as illustrated by current debates about depictions of the Tea Party movement. But by glossing over the antiblack aspects of the right's rise, Alterman seems to have fallen victim to the same "working the refs" strategy he accuses conservatives of deploying to restrain the so-called liberal bias of the mainstream media. This race-averse analysis is troubling enough when it comes from mainstream pundits paralyzed by the faux symmetry of on-the-other-hand "objectivity." But when a progressive pundit adopts the same frame, it is more distressing still. Indeed, it is yet another example of how a black presidency has scrambled our cultural and political syntax: a usually astute intellectual from the dwindling ranks of America's left pens an essay assessing the prospects of progressive policy from a black president and fails to incorporate any racial analysis in his assessment.

Many have focused on Alterman's statement that progressives are deeply disappointed with the Obama administration as a way to reinforce their own positions, but few seem ready to address his overall, and rather grudging, point: that Obama may well be the most progressive alternative possible in our current reality. Alterman is throwing down the gauntlet to his fellow travelers, urging us to more carefully assess the context in which we find ourselves and devote more energy to organizing than complaining—to get in where we fit in, so to speak. While reading his advice, I couldn't help but think of the late Jimmy Weinstein, founder and longtime editor of In These Times, the magazine for which I toil. Jimmy would often find himself at odds with left sectarians for urging more robust engagement with the Democratic Party. Overtly left politics were a hard sell in America, he would argue, but true progressive ideas were inherently popular. If the left organized on specific issues and developed active coalitions around those issues, we could forge a more progressive electorate—despite ourselves.

This advice seems almost elementary, but Alterman used almost 17,000 words to make a case for it. He has joined the chorus urging the intellectual left to rethink its devotion to marginality. Aside from his curious myopia around issues of race, Alterman makes a sound argument for a more nuanced assessment of Obama's tenure and a more mature engagement with a decrepit political system in dire need of serious reforms. Ω

[Salim Muwakkil (born Alonzo Canady, Jr.) served in the U.S. Air Force for five years as an administration specialist. After the completion of his Air Force service, Muwakkil earned a B.A. in political science from Rutgers Univesrity. In 1984, he became the senior editor of In These Times. In 1993, he also became a contributing columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times as well as a contributing columnist for the Chicago Tribune.]

Copyright © 2010 The Nation

Get the Google Reader at no cost from Google. Click on this link to go on a tour of the Google Reader. If you read a lot of blogs, load Reader with your regular sites, then check them all on one page. The Reader's share function lets you publicize your favorite posts.

Creative Commons License
Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves by Neil Sapper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Based on a work at Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available here.

Copyright © 2010 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.