Saturday, July 16, 2011

Have A Sip Of Teabagger Kool-Aid & You Can Sabotage Government Finances, Ruin Our Credit, & Precipitate A Recession (All Over Again)!

Here's "a primer for Teabaggers who think [using term loosely] the U.S. can get away without raising the debt limit." The clock is ticking and the Dumbos are awash in nuttiness. The Dumbos in the House of Representatives seek to preserve the 100W incandescent bulb — and damn the environment. The Senate Dumbos are demanding a Balanced Budget Amendment so that Washington can more closely resemble Sacramento, Madison, Austin, and all of the other state-operated loony bins that have constitutional balanced budget requirements. Joseph Conrad wrote about the heart of darkness in colonial Africa; the corresponding novel about the early 21st century USA should be The Heart of Stupidity. If this is a (fair & balanced) warning of doomsday, so be it.

[x Salon]
What Happens If The Debt Ceiling Bomb Explodes?
By Andrew Leonard

Tag Cloud of the following article

created at

In some quarters of the American political system, there are people — predominantly of the Tea Party Republican persuasion — who believe that Congress doesn't need to raise the debt ceiling. If the U.S. government isn't allowed to borrow any more money to pay its bills, runs their line of thinking, that's fine and dandy. Finally, we'd be forced to tighten our belts and "live within our means!" Ignore the fearmongers predicting disaster — they're just trying to scare markets and voters.

Well, OK, what would happen? With less than three weeks to go before the Aug. 2 deadline — the point at which the U.S. Treasury runs out of tricks to keep government borrowing under the debt limit — and with tension growing in Washington as Democrats and Republicans appear progressively less able to come to agreement, it's probably worth reviewing the possible scenarios.

Let's start with the basic numbers. According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, the U.S. Treasury will have about $172.4 billion in revenue in August that can be applied to $306.7 billion in outstanding bills. If the U.S. Treasury is forbidden from borrowing any additional funds, it will therefore have to cut total August spending by about $134 billion, or 44 percent.

What does that mean, exactly? Well, here's a fun game everyone can play. Click on over to this cool interactive widget at Bloomberg Government and decide for yourself who gets paid and who doesn't if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling.

First on the list: $29 billion in interest payments on Treasury securities. Even most Republicans believe it would be a horrible idea to default on government debt. It's the kind of thing that would almost assuredly destabilize global financial markets — perhaps as badly as the credit crunch problems of 2008, or maybe even worse. U.S. Treasury securities are considered the world's safest haven for parking cash in uncertain times. If the world's biggest economy can no longer stand behind its debt obligations, we could witness a financial panic that dwarfs the disruptions caused by the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.

OK, let's not do that. Next up, let's decide that we absolutely, positively must pay for Social Security benefits ($49.2 billion), Medicare ($28.6 billion), Medicaid ($21.4 billion). To do otherwise would invite immediate political annihilation. Republicans area already freaking out at hearing Obama say he couldn't guarantee Social Security checks would go out on time. What if the GOP was blamed for that?!

Oh, and then there are the troops! Can't mess with the national defense! Let's add defense vendor payments ($31. 7 billion), military active duty pay ($2.9 billion) and Veteran's Affairs ($2.9 billion).

Hmm, what else. Oh, how about unemployment benefits ($12.8 billion)?

Whoops! We just hit $178 billion — we're $4 billion over the limit. Let's see, who can we stiff? The unemployed? Defense contractors? The elderly poor? Chinese bondholders?

And what have we left out? How about all federal salaries, food stamps, the Justice Department, Homeland Security, air traffic control, the Centers for Disease Control, NASA, the EPA, and highway funding, for starters. And there's much, much more.

Now, there are plenty of Tea Partyers who would no doubt be happy to get rid of the EPA, food stamps, unemployment benefits, Medicaid and any number of other government spending programs. There's probably plenty of Americans who could also find better things to do with $30 billion than pay defense contractors. There are lots of different ways to divvy up government spending according to your personal priorities.

But no matter how you slice it, you're subtracting about $132 billion of government spending from the economy. Figuring out exactly what kind of economic impact that kind of cut would have is far from an exact science, but the Center for American Progress' Michael Ettlinger and Michael Linden calculated that if the U.S. government cut its spending at that rate for both August and September, GDP growth would drop by 2.3 percent from the previous quarter.

To put that kind of drop in perspective, consider that the biggest quarter-to-quarter drop in nominal GDP since 1947, when official statistics began, was 2 percent from the third to fourth quarter of 2008 — the middle of the Great Recession, when we lost nearly 2 million jobs.

If the economy was humming along, cutting spending by such a huge amount in a short period of time would still be a major blow to overcome. When the economy is sick and barely growing, we're talking a Chinese high-speed rail ticket back to recession.

Choose your poison: global market chaos, savage cuts to the social welfare safety net or recession. Or, heck, all of the above.

And that's not all. Slower economic growth means less tax revenue, which would force even more budget cuts. Laying off hundreds of thousands of federal employees would further boost the unemployment rate. And if the U.S. government ever did end up authorized to borrow money again, the yield it would likely have to offer to attract buyers for its damaged goods would undoubtedly skyrocket -- putting further pressure on government finances. Credit rating services are already putting the U.S. on notice that a failure to raise the debt limit will result in a credit downgrade -- a development that would raise borrowing costs and increase government deficits in the long run, regardless of what the government ended up choosing to pay for.

If tempers are flaring in Washington, there's a good reason. Our political leaders have committed countless blunders over the decades, but sabotaging government finances, ruining our credit, and precipitating a recession, on purpose, would immediately rank at the very top of the list. Ω

[Andrew Leonard is a staff writer for Salon magazine. His work has also appeared in the Far Eastern Economic Review, the Nation, British Esquire, the New York Times Book Review, the Columbia Journalism Review, Asia Inc., the San Francisco Bay Guardian, Wired, and numerous other publications. He has been technology editor for the online magazine Web Review, Packet Culture columnist for HotWired, and was the writer of the ill-fated Secret Files of Bill Gates for America Online. His first book, Bots: Origin of New Species, was published in 2007. Leonard is a graduate of the University of California at Berkeley.]

Copyright © 2011 Salon Media Group, Inc.

Get the Google Reader at no cost from Google. Click on this link to go on a tour of the Google Reader. If you read a lot of blogs, load Reader with your regular sites, then check them all on one page. The Reader's share function lets you publicize your favorite posts.

Creative Commons License
Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves by Neil Sapper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Based on a work at Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available here.

Copyright © 2011 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.