Saturday, January 05, 2013

How About "Send In The Clowns" As The Theme Song For The U.S. House In The 113th Congress?

Today's blog post opens with a grabber about the U.S. House of Representatives: "the clowns are in charge." In fact, here's some appropriate musical accompanyment for today's blog post:

[x YouTube/LuckyMusic Channel]
"Send In The Clowns" (1973)
Music and Lyrics by Stephen Sondheim
Performed By Judy Collins (1991)

The "clowns" in the lyrics do not reference circus performers, the "clowns" are fools AKA Dumbos. Just this AM, this blogger read that the U.S. Representative in his district, Michael McCaul (R-TX), joined nine other Dumbos from Texas in voting against the bill providing initial relief for the victims of Superstorm Sandy in NJ and NY. Going to McCaul's web site, there is a disclaimer at the e-mail link to Representative McCaul that warns that McCaul is sooooooooo busy that he cannot reply to every e-mail message he receives. Nonetheless, this blogger wrote: "Shame on you for voting against Superstorm Sandy relief! I am ashamed that you represent me." Looking down the road, a superstorm will likely strike the Texas Gulf Coast and this blogger wonders if Representative McCaul will vote against relief for his own district that extends from the northern suburbs of Houston to Austin (thanks to Dumbo redistricting). In fact, if a superstorm leveled McCaul's mansion in Tomball, TX, this blogger wouldn't waste a moment on "sorry." If this is (fair & balanced) Dumbo-hatred, so be it.

[x Salon]
GOP: The Clowns Are In Charge
By Jonathan Bernstein

Tag Cloud of the following article

created at
(Click to embiggen)

Alex Pareene had a very nice piece this week about the responsibility Northeast Republicans such as Chris Christie have for the very Republican craziness that prevented Sandy relief from passing the House of Representatives in the final days of the 112th Congress. He’s right, but there’s a group that’s even more responsible: sane conservatives.

That’s the lesson of the fiscal cliff end game — and of the pathetic “revolt” against John Boehner. In fact, it’s a reminder that the key hostage game in Washington isn’t that Republicans are threatening the nation’s economy over the debt limit. It’s that mainstream conservatives have allowed themselves to be taken hostage by fools and clowns.

The obvious truth about the Republican Party right now is that the tail is wagging the dog. The party’s dynamic, repeated again and again, is that everyone is afraid of being a called a RINO — a Republican in name only — and everyone accepts the ability of a few goofballs and a bunch of media hucksters to define what “real conservative” means.

That’s produced a completely dysfunctional party, and in turn it’s making the United States increasingly difficult to govern. Even when there’s an obvious, easy compromise to be had – as there was on the fiscal cliff — Republicans have the most convoluted time reaching that deal because a handful of people have decided that compromise itself is against their principles. And worse, the sensible people in the party are terrified of them.

This is exactly the opposite of how normal parties operate. Normally, in a two-party system, both parties have strong incentives to move to the middle, since that’s where the votes are. That can be extremely frustrating to ideologues! Centrist members of Congress, as a result, often appear to have disproportionate influence. That’s not only because they can threaten to work with the other party, or that they’re well-positioned for making deals with the other party. It’s because most politicians concerned with reelection want to appear fairly close to the center.

For Democrats, what winds up happening is that the most moderate group doesn’t want to vote with the most liberal ones, and then the mainstream group wants to at least sometimes vote with the moderates and against the extreme. The check against that is the nomination process, which pushes politicians toward the party’s base (sometimes a bit farther, since primary electorates are farther from the center than are all party identifiers). Overall, there’s a balance, but it tends to favor the center.

What’s happened with Republicans is basically the opposite; they’ve become overly focused on nomination and, even in statewide elections in tough states such as Delaware and Nevada, they undervalue — and lose — general elections.

If that was the entire story, we would simply have an unusually ideological and conservative Republican Party. From a conservative point of view, it might even be well worth it to sacrifice a few general elections in order to push everyone who does win toward loyalty to conservative causes.

But it isn’t the end. Instead, what’s happened is that mainstream conservatives have allowed the Michele Bachmanns and Louie Gohmerts and Tim Huelskamps — and the Glenn Becks and Rush Limbaughs — to define “real” conservative ideas. And those folks aren’t really more conservative than, say, John Boehner or Mitch McConnell; they’re just shills and hucksters, either because they really believe a lot of nonsense or because it’s in their interest to peddle it to other chumps. Indeed: on the media side, and probably on the politician side, there’s a strong incentive for them to constantly differentiate themselves from other conservatives so that they can set themselves up as insurgents against an “establishment.”

The problem isn’t the Gohmerts and Bachmanns — it’s the perfectly sane, very conservative members of Congress, probably at least half of the House GOP, who are so afraid of epithets such as “establishment” and “RINO” that they allow themselves to be easily manipulated by the clowns. These folks have absolutely first-rate conservative credentials but aren’t willing to stand up for them against cranks and charlatans. Even though they presumably know that having a Democrat in the White House means they’ll have to cut deals at times. That there’s no plot to impose Islamic law on the United States. That Barack Obama is actually an American citizen. That forcing the United States government to default would actually be a bad thing. And this: that as much as they would wish it, not every conservative idea is overwhelmingly popular.

The consequence of all this is pretty simple: a dysfunctional, unpopular Republican Party. Which is (in my view) bad for the nation as a whole but is without question bad for solidly conservative Republicans.

You would think they’d do something about it. So far, though, I don’t even see a faint sign of it. Ω

[Jonathan Bernstein is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He received a BA from Wesleyan University and both an MA and a PhD from the University of California at Berkeley; all of his work was done in political science. Bernstein blogs at A plain blog about politics.]

Copyright © 2013 Salon Media Group

Get the Google Reader at no cost from Google. Click on this link to go on a tour of the Google Reader. If you read a lot of blogs, load Reader with your regular sites, then check them all on one page. The Reader's share function lets you publicize your favorite posts.

Creative Commons License
Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves by Neil Sapper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Based on a work at Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available here.

Copyright © 2013 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves

No comments:

Post a Comment

☛ STOP!!! Read the following BEFORE posting a Comment!

Include your e-mail address with your comment or your comment will be deleted by default. Your e-mail address will be DELETED before the comment is posted to this blog. Comments to entries in this blog are moderated by the blogger. Violators of this rule can KMA (Kiss My A-Double-Crooked-Letter) as this blogger's late maternal grandmother would say. No e-mail address (to be verified AND then deleted by the blogger) within the comment, no posting. That is the (fair & balanced) rule for comments to this blog.