15 Years Later, This Blogger Says: "Release All Of The 9/11 Records" (And Let The Saudi Chips Fall Where They May)

When this blogger read in The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals coupled with the hush-hush 9/11 transport of Saudi citizens in the US on plane flights when all other aviation had been grounded after 9/11. this blogger thought he detected a bad smell. The air would be cleared to a degree by the enactment of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. It won't bring back any of the 9/11 victims, but it would be one important step toward justice. If this is (fair & balanced) demand for justice, so be it.

PS: The NFL will play its games today — business as usual.

[x Ny Fishwrap]
Release More 9/11 Records
By Bob Grahma

TagCrowd cloud of the following piece of writing

act american anniversary arabia asserting attack authority bandar chapter citizens claim classified commission congressional democracy documents family finished foreign found government hijackers important including information inquiry investigation justice lawsuit led lived nation pages possible prince public questions release remain report saudi secrecy secret secure sept sponsors support terrorism ties years

created at TagCrowd.com

In July, after approval from the Obama administration, Congress released a 28-page chapter of previously classified material from the final report of a joint congressional inquiry into the Sept. 11 attacks. Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, Adel al-Jubeir, said that the document had ruled out any Saudi involvement in the attack. “The matter is now finished,” he declared.

But it is not finished. Questions about whether the Saudi government assisted the terrorists remain unanswered. Now, as we approach the 15^th anniversary of the most heinous attack on the United States since Pearl Harbor, it is time for our government to release more documents from other investigations into September 11 that have remained secret all these years.

The recently released 28 pages were written in the fall of 2002 by a committee of which I was a co-chairman. That chapter focused on three of the 19 hijackers who lived for a time in Los Angeles and San Diego. The pages suggested new trails of inquiry worth following, including why a Qaeda operative had the unlisted phone number for the company that managed the Colorado estate of Prince Bandar bin Sultan [aka Bandar Bush], then the Saudi ambassador.

Some of those questions might be answered if the government released more of the findings of the September 11 commission, the citizens inquiry that followed our congressional inquest. The commission said that it found no Saudi links to the hijackers. But the government could satisfy lingering doubts by releasing more of the commission’s records. Parallel investigations were also conducted by the FBI andCIA How much did they look into whether Prince Bandar or other Saudis aided the hijackers?

The government also knows more today about the 16 hijackers who lived outside California than when the 28 pages were classified in 2003. Much of that information remains secret but should be made public. For example, the FBI for a time claimed that it had found no ties between three of the hijackers, including their leader, Mohamed Atta, and a prominent Saudi family that lived in Sarasota, FL, before September 11. The family returned to the kingdom about two weeks before the attack. But in 2013, a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by investigative reporters led to the release of about 30 pages from an FBI-led investigation that included an agent’s report asserting “many connections” between the hijackers and this family. The FBI said the agent’s claim was unfounded, and the family said it had no ties to the hijackers. Still, a federal judge in 2014 ordered the bureau to turn over an additional 80,000 pages from its investigation, and he is reviewing those for possible public release.

There is one more thing our government could do to shed light on the attack. For more than a decade, the families of September 11 victims have been litigating against the kingdom and Saudi interests, asserting that they facilitated the murder of their loved ones. With the support of the Justice Department, the Saudis used a 1976 law providing foreign nations some immunity from American lawsuits to block those efforts to secure justice. Now, both the Senate and House of Representatives have unanimously passed a bill, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, that would allow a thorough judicial examination of the Saudi role.

Some might ask, 15 years later, what difference does all this make?

In fact, a lot. It can mean justice for the families that have suffered so grievously. It can also mean improving our national security, which has been compromised by the extreme form of Islam that has been promoted by Saudi Arabia.

But the most important reason is to avoid the corrosive effect that government secrecy can have on a democracy. The nation that denies its people information about what it is doing in their name is a nation slogging down a dark alley of public suspicion toward decline and mediocrity. As Daniel Patrick Moynihan put it, “Secrecy is for losers.”

The government’s possible suppression of evidence of Saudi support for the 19 hijackers would go beyond passive cover-up. Is the government releasing false information, while continuing to classify documents containing the truth? As the presidential campaign is proving, appearances of government deception have contributed to wary Americans becoming more and more outraged with their elected officials.

In recognition of another anniversary, 45 years since the publication of the Pentagon Papers, Sanford J. Ungar, who teaches seminars on free speech at Georgetown and Harvard, said: “Nothing is more important to the health and sustainability of a modern democracy than its citizens’ awareness of, and confidence in, what their government is doing. Excessive government secrecy — inherent, instinctive, utterly unnecessary and often bureaucratically self-protective — is poison to the well-being of civil society.”

I care deeply about our nation’s future, its tradition of openness and the necessity of honesty in our international relations. President Obama has less than five months remaining in his term. I commend him for his decision to authorize the release of the 28 pages. He should sign the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act and use his authority to direct the release of all the chapters of the book of September 11. And then our country must act based on the truths they may reveal. Ω

[Daniel Robert "Bob" Graham served as the 38^th governor of Florida (1979-1987) and US Senator (1987-2005). Since leaving public life, the Florida Democrat has written
three nonfiction books: Workdays: Finding Florida on the Job, Intelligence Matters, and America: The Owner's Manual as well as a novel, The Keys to the Kingdom. Graham received a BA (political science, Phi Beta Kappa) from the University of Florida and an LLB from the Law School of Harvard University.]

Copyright © 2016 The New York Times Company




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

Copyright © 2016 Sapper's (Fair & Balanced) Rants & Raves